Research
Why Stelliums Versions Astrology Rules and Interpretation Separately
A reproducibility standard for astrology software: astronomical facts, doctrine rules, editorial text, and presentation should not silently overwrite one another.
Astrology software often presents a single polished answer even though several different systems produced it: ephemeris calculations, house/rulership rules, interpretive doctrine, and presentation logic. Stelliums records those layers separately so a later editorial revision does not pretend the underlying chart calculation changed.
Four layers to preserve
- Astronomical facts — positions, angles, motion, and calculation timestamp.
- Rules — the governed Hellenistic logic used to derive houses, sect, Lots, aspects, and timing facts.
- Interpretation — versioned prose attached to deterministic chart facts.
- Presentation — prioritization and narrative logic deciding what a reader sees first.
Why old output should remain reproducible
When a paid report or saved chart interpretation is created, the exact rule/template/interpretation versions can be preserved. Improvements can then move forward without silently changing what was previously delivered.
What versioning does not solve
Versioning does not prove that a doctrine is historically correct. It makes the system inspectable: users and editors can identify which assumptions were used, compare revisions, and keep unsupported techniques blocked until they are governed.
Sources
1Stelliums Hellenistic Rules Registry
Stelliums methodology · Internal rules-governance specification
Method note
Stelliums separates cited historical or scholarly material, computational rules, and interpretation. A published article does not silently change calculation logic; engine and rules changes remain independently versioned.